Use and perception of areas of permanent preservation in an environmentally differentiated land reform settlement in Anapu, Pará
Uso e percepção de áreas de preservação permanente em assentamento ambientalmente diferenciado em Anapu, Pará
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36920/esa-v26n3-8Abstract
This study assessed how residents of an environmentally-sound land reform settlement in Anapu, Pará, perceive and use forests and permanent preservation areas (PPAs). Quantitative methods (comparative areas from mapping) and qualitative (semi-structured interviews) evaluated the effect of tenurial situation, access to the plot and predominant economic activity in the conservation of PPAs and forests. Considering only the preservation of PPAs, the quantitative analysis showed no significant difference between groups compared. In relation to forests, greater preservation was associated with the activity carried out in the lot: prioritization of agriculture was associated with higher percentage of forests than prioritization of livestock, although no statistical relevance was observed for this association. The qualitative analysis indicated that land tenure regularity is not perceived as a factor for greater conservation of PPAs. Main differences in the use of PPA were also perceived regarding the economic activity prioritized in the lot.
Keywords: environmental conservation; Amazon deforestation; agriculture; cattleranching.
SOUSA, Laís Victoria Ferreira de; PORRO, Roberto. Uso e percepção de áreas de preservação permanente em assentamento ambientalmente diferenciado em Anapu, Pará. Estudos Sociedade e Agricultura, v. 26, n. 3, p. 656-680, out. 2018.
Submitted in march 2018.
Accepted in august 2018.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
a) Authors maintain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which allows the sharing of the work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b) Authors are authorized to take additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
c) Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (eg in institutional repositories or on their personal page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate productive changes, as well as increase the impact and citation of published work (See The Effect of Free Access).